Page 1 of 2 12>
Topic Options
#2003218 - 09/20/11 12:36 PM Grade the Fisk Rookie!
K-dog
veteran


Registered: 11/03/09
Posts: 1226

Offline
Another card I have owned for a while.Some on the forum will consider it to be in the "wrong" holder! ;\) Tell me what you think SGC might grade it!



Sorry,not a great scan!

Top
#2003219 - 09/20/11 12:38 PM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: K-dog]
vintagetoppsguy
veteran


Registered: 02/02/08
Posts: 1310
Loc: Sugar Land, TX

Offline
SGC 80 (6).
_________________________
Collecting 1965 Topps High #'s SGC 88 or better: 10/91

BUYING Well Centered:
1956 Topps SGC 84 or Better (or raw equivalent)
1965 Topps SGC 88 or Better (or raw equivalent)

Top
#2003220 - 09/20/11 12:44 PM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: vintagetoppsguy]
K-dog
veteran


Registered: 11/03/09
Posts: 1226

Offline
 Originally Posted By: vintagetoppsguy
SGC 80 (6).


80???? I guess I better leave it in that holder then!! LOL! \:D

Top
#2003221 - 09/20/11 01:11 PM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: K-dog]
yankeeno7
enthusiast


Registered: 03/10/09
Posts: 375

Offline
its really very difficult to tell from that pic. Its too far away and not clear. Im guessing that vintagetoppsguy is seeing what I do...that top right corner? real hard to say with that pic. The way I see it now, I agree with SGC 80
Top
#2003222 - 09/20/11 01:19 PM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: yankeeno7]
Blackie
Carpal Tunnel


Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 4766
Loc: Southern US

Offline
Im going to say 70 due to Centering but and corner
_________________________
Working on the following sets:
1966 Topps Football
1964-65 Topps Hockey
Upgrades to 65Topps Football

Top
#2003223 - 09/20/11 01:35 PM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: Blackie]
K-dog
veteran


Registered: 11/03/09
Posts: 1226

Offline
Wow...I guess this is proof that a bad scans of a card can be really deceptive! LOL! Thanks for the replies. I will try to get a scan that shows a better representation of this card. The corners are NM+ sharp and the centering is better than 65/35.
Top
#2003224 - 09/20/11 01:46 PM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: K-dog]
Blackie
Carpal Tunnel


Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 4766
Loc: Southern US

Offline
Kdog it was hard to tell. Hell it could be a 84... Wasnt sure on the corners though bro! Dave and the others are probably much closer than my guess

Edited by Blackie (09/20/11 01:46 PM)
_________________________
Working on the following sets:
1966 Topps Football
1964-65 Topps Hockey
Upgrades to 65Topps Football

Top
#2003236 - 09/20/11 06:40 PM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: Blackie]
DrD
addict


Registered: 05/30/10
Posts: 400
Loc: Mizzourah, Northa KC

Offline
88 at least
_________________________
"The government’s view of the economy could be summed up.....If it moves, TAX it. If it keeps moving, REGULATE it. And if it stops moving, SUBSIDIZE it.”.....President Reagan, 1986

Top
#2003272 - 09/21/11 08:58 AM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: DrD]
Mintacular
old hand


Registered: 08/19/09
Posts: 1121
Loc: Pittsburgh

Offline
80/6
_________________________
eBay Listings


Top
#2003358 - 09/23/11 07:46 AM Re: Grade the Fisk Rookie! [Re: Mintacular]
aconte
Bid more or post more... tough one...


Registered: 02/22/02
Posts: 1896
Loc: On The Beach....where else!

Offline
I don't have a clue but it looks like a nice card.


aconte
_________________________

Top
Page 1 of 2 12>


Moderator:  EARLSWORLD 
Hop to:
Who's Online
0 registered and 11 anonymous users online.
Newest Members
defghi104200, jklmno253672, hijklm176309, defghi521014, klmnop450123
1967 Registered Users

Generated in 0.018 seconds in which 0.001 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression disabled.