Page 8 of 10 « First<678910>
Topic Options
#2013306 - 12/04/12 05:49 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: vintagebaseball]
trex
addict


Registered: 01/31/12
Posts: 592

Offline
 Originally Posted By: vintagebaseball
The scans exaggerate the slightest flaws...


You might look at your photo editor settings to tone down the flaws to make them more representative of the actual card. I'd start with toying around with the sharpening setting, maybe tone it down just a tad, doesn't take much and play with your contrast setting but again in small increments. It's kinda of a balancing act to keep the pic as sharp as you can while getting the flaws in line with the actual card. You might also play around with your scanner settings, very slightly, to get the pic like you want it. To get the clutter/lint off the pics, keep your scanner bed clean. I dust mine off before every use. Also make sure there's no lint/dust etc on your card holder. Your scans look real nice though.

Really nice cards, and like the rest, they really look so much better in SGC holders.
_________________________














Top
#2013311 - 12/04/12 09:13 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: vintagebaseball]
mattsey9
stranger


Registered: 11/28/12
Posts: 1
Loc: Illinois

Offline
 Originally Posted By: vintagebaseball
It is refreshing to be around folks who realize a card can be nice and solid without being an "8". Don't get me wrong, who wouldn't like to have a collection of them? I know of collectors who have a lot more $$ than I ever will who won't even look at a card that is EX 5. I will never have the $$ to do that. I really enjoy what I am able to get. I like looking at the stuff you guys put up. I have seen some really nice stuff from you.


This is pretty much me to a T. I light up when I'm cruising Ebay and see a card from the 50's that obviously spent time in the spokes of some kids bicycle. I get the card I want, and don't have to break the bank to do it. I do appreciate the finer quality cards, I just get the same satisfaction from my 54 Aaron that someone with a NM version would.
_________________________
Always looking for poor grade 1954 Topps to finish my set.

Top
#2013312 - 12/04/12 09:14 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: mattsey9]
Blackie
Carpal Tunnel


Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 4766
Loc: Southern US

Offline
I agree with ya!
_________________________
Working on the following sets:
1966 Topps Football
1964-65 Topps Hockey
Upgrades to 65Topps Football

Top
#2013313 - 12/04/12 09:51 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: mattsey9]
vintagebaseball
member


Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 114

Offline
Just got notification that my 50 Bowman Robinson is on its way back from SGC...I had to look. It graded a 50, which I am fine with. It's a good looking card!!
Top
#2013314 - 12/04/12 09:52 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: mattsey9]
vintagebaseball
member


Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 114

Offline
That's how I feel, too. My Robinson graded out at 4. Great card for the $!
Top
#2013315 - 12/04/12 09:54 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: vintagebaseball]
Blackie
Carpal Tunnel


Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 4766
Loc: Southern US

Offline
Lets see a scan when it comes in
_________________________
Working on the following sets:
1966 Topps Football
1964-65 Topps Hockey
Upgrades to 65Topps Football

Top
#2013316 - 12/04/12 09:57 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: Blackie]
vintagebaseball
member


Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 114

Offline
Will do!
Top
#2013317 - 12/04/12 10:05 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: vintagebaseball]
vintagebaseball
member


Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 114

Offline
I still think it looks better than the PSA 5s on eBay. I will post it when I get it.
Top
#2013318 - 12/04/12 10:10 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: Blackie]
cammb
old hand


Registered: 12/30/10
Posts: 890
Loc: Jamesport, NY

Offline
Gerry Dvorak
Top
#2013320 - 12/04/12 11:09 AM Re: 1st time submitter [Re: cammb]
SMtJoy
veteran


Registered: 01/23/08
Posts: 1503

Offline
I wanted to comment on the hi-def scans and they do really bring out the issues more so then holding the card in your hand, one thing to remember is that's how the graders are looking at your cards and why I think a lot of people are disappointed with the grades they get back, esp first time submitters. They might look great in hard but grading is more about identifying flaw even tiny ones more so than judging the strengths of a card.
Top
Page 8 of 10 « First<678910>


Moderator:  EARLSWORLD 
Hop to:
Who's Online
0 registered and 12 anonymous users online.
Newest Members
defghi104200, jklmno253672, hijklm176309, defghi521014, klmnop450123
1967 Registered Users

Generated in 0.114 seconds in which 0.096 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression disabled.