Page 2 of 2 <12
Topic Options
#2014305 - 01/02/13 01:52 PM Re: The Official 1965 Topps Baseball Thread [Re: vintagetoppsguy]
vintagebaseball
member


Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 114

Offline
Vintagetoppsguy, let me say I like your style. I am doing about the same as you. Most of my stars are graded and most everything else is raw. I have found buying nice, mid-grade raw commons allows me to be able to afford more high caliber star cards. With the exception of my 53 Mantle, I have been able to acquire everything EX 5 or better. The Mantle is a crease-free VGEX 4 that looks really nice.

My goal is to someday complete Topps sets from 53-59. So far, I have the 53 and have a decent start at 54. If I ever complete those 50s, I would either do what you are doing in the 60s or try a Play Ball or Bowman set.

Top
#2014764 - 01/12/13 08:24 PM Re: The Official 1965 Topps Baseball Thread [Re: vintagebaseball]
vintagetoppsguy
veteran


Registered: 02/02/08
Posts: 1310
Loc: Sugar Land, TX

Offline
It's been about a week since I've picked up anything, but I won this on eBay tonight...




I'm bidding on a few others that I hope to win this week.
_________________________
Collecting 1965 Topps High #'s SGC 88 or better: 10/91

BUYING Well Centered:
1956 Topps SGC 84 or Better (or raw equivalent)
1965 Topps SGC 88 or Better (or raw equivalent)

Top
#2014870 - 01/15/13 10:44 AM Re: The Official 1965 Topps Baseball Thread [Re: vintagetoppsguy]
vintagetoppsguy
veteran


Registered: 02/02/08
Posts: 1310
Loc: Sugar Land, TX

Offline
Picked up my first 96 from a fellow board member (on eBay). I got outbid on another 96 though from a different seller. That brings my total to 10/91 high numbers.

_________________________
Collecting 1965 Topps High #'s SGC 88 or better: 10/91

BUYING Well Centered:
1956 Topps SGC 84 or Better (or raw equivalent)
1965 Topps SGC 88 or Better (or raw equivalent)

Top
#2014872 - 01/15/13 11:07 AM Re: The Official 1965 Topps Baseball Thread [Re: vintagetoppsguy]
Blackie
Carpal Tunnel


Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 4765
Loc: Southern US

Offline
NICE!!!
_________________________
Working on the following sets:
1966 Topps Football
1964-65 Topps Hockey
Upgrades to 65Topps Football

Top
#2014874 - 01/15/13 02:19 PM Re: The Official 1965 Topps Baseball Thread [Re: Blackie]
bbo
The Collectinator


Registered: 02/07/06
Posts: 3374
Loc: Top of the 1959 Registry

Offline
Never understood why these were called "Large Print" and "Small Print" since it's really more of a spacing issue than font size.



One of Ernie's worst poses and one of Boog's best.



I must be on the front rooooooooow! Only if Lou is saving you a seat, Uecker.



Rookie card of the guy who could've run for mayor of Boston in 1966 and won, next to the rookie card of Faith Hill's father in law.




A better fisherman than pitcher (so I've heard) and a future anchor for the Big Red Machine.



If not for these guys, Yankees would've cratered a year earlier.



Finishing up for now with a few high numbered team cards.



The 1965 set looks good no matter what holder they're in, or whether they're even in a slab. The good news about the high numbers, no other set in the 1960's has easier-to-find highs, until you get to 1968. I never bought the SP theory in 1965, but it has to be a factor. Since there were 132 cards to a sheet, or two sets of 66. The series runs from 523-598 which is 76 cards. By far, the most difficult series in 1965 is the 3rd/4th series, card numbers 197-370, followed by the 1st and 2nd. In fact, the Beckett price guide still lists #371-598 as a single, uninterrupted series with the commons at $7 per card. Wonder if Topps ramped up the print runs late in the year?

Don't get me wrong. There are some tough cards in high grade within the high series. It's just that these ain't them. Watch out for commons of the Twins and Cardinals as well as the usual Yankees and Dodgers. Another word of warning is to make sure the card completely fills the holder. There's a lot of trimming goin' on out there. (You know the sellers who I'm talkin' 'bout, Willis.)


Edited by bbo (01/16/13 11:05 AM)
Edit Reason: to remove scans of non-SGC cards
_________________________
#1 in 1959 Topps. Officially known as Assassin according to stanthemanfan 3/31/2014 and god of minor league basketball according to cammb.

Top
#2014875 - 01/15/13 02:51 PM Re: The Official 1965 Topps Baseball Thread [Re: bbo]
vintagetoppsguy
veteran


Registered: 02/02/08
Posts: 1310
Loc: Sugar Land, TX

Offline
Beautiful '65s!
_________________________
Collecting 1965 Topps High #'s SGC 88 or better: 10/91

BUYING Well Centered:
1956 Topps SGC 84 or Better (or raw equivalent)
1965 Topps SGC 88 or Better (or raw equivalent)

Top
#2014877 - 01/15/13 02:58 PM Re: The Official 1965 Topps Baseball Thread [Re: vintagetoppsguy]
vintagetoppsguy
veteran


Registered: 02/02/08
Posts: 1310
Loc: Sugar Land, TX

Offline
Speaking of cards that may have been trimmed, I'm noticing this a lot even in TPG slabs. I've had my eye on this card for a while, but the borders look really thin (compared to another card of the same). Are my eyes decieving me or do the borders look thin to anyone else?



_________________________
Collecting 1965 Topps High #'s SGC 88 or better: 10/91

BUYING Well Centered:
1956 Topps SGC 84 or Better (or raw equivalent)
1965 Topps SGC 88 or Better (or raw equivalent)

Top
#2014921 - 01/16/13 07:14 PM Re: The Official 1965 Topps Baseball Thread [Re: vintagetoppsguy]
BigRedOne
old hand


Registered: 01/21/08
Posts: 1046

Offline
Hi David

I think the Lefebvre looks ok to me.


Congratulations on the 65 Set. Back in the day when I did baseball I had a real nice 65 set going. To me it was hands down the best looking set of the sixties. I just loved the bright bold colors and the card design with the pennant.

That card design just stood out among all the other sets. The design, bold colors and excellant photos it is still the one sixties baseball set that I would want to build.

I admire your collecting philosiphy, it is very similar to how I like to collect as well.

One of the reasons I dumped all of my baseball sets a few years back in favor of my beloved Football sets was because of the set size.

I just couldn't afford it. Of all the Baseball card sets I dumped, The 65 is probably the one I wish I had kept.

Every time I see someone post beautiful 65's I kind of regret selling mine off.

When I seen those beautiful Playoff cards BBO posted, I thought MAN, I should have keep the 65's!

And now with you posting those cherry Hi numbers I can't help but think the same thing again.

I think you made the right choice picking the 65 set.

Good Luck with it and thanks for posting the scans!

John


Edited by BigRedOne (01/16/13 07:16 PM)
_________________________

Top
Page 2 of 2 <12


Moderator:  EARLSWORLD 
Hop to:
Who's Online
0 registered and 3 anonymous users online.
Newest Members
klmnop450123, abcdef863349, vwxyz{570399, nopqrs004715, tjf092071
1963 Registered Users

Generated in 0.052 seconds in which 0.001 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression disabled.