Page 2 of 2 <12
Topic Options
#40794 - 03/29/03 01:42 PM Re: Box was a real loser due to condition... [Re: Dungeon]
Lothar52
enthusiast


Registered: 08/23/02
Posts: 240
Loc: Ohio, USA

Offline
opinions are like poodoo holes sir... everybody's got one

personally i find the set attractive... but i dont collect it.

of the 70's i only find 1972 and 1979 somehwat unattractive, but that just my opinion
of the i find no unattractive sets in the 50 or 60s though
Lothar52
_________________________
--------------------
I love CAKE....

Top
#40795 - 03/29/03 02:20 PM Re: Box was a real loser due to condition... [Re: Lothar52]
Dungeon
If you have a dream about out-posting me, you better wake up and apologize.


Registered: 02/28/03
Posts: 2787
Loc: Still Married!

Offline
but 77? sheesh. I agree that 1972 and 1979 are buttt ugly!
_________________________
"Flesh eating is unprovoked murder" - Ben Franklin

Top
#40796 - 03/30/03 02:04 AM Re: Box was a real loser due to condition... [Re: Dungeon]
Lothar52
enthusiast


Registered: 08/23/02
Posts: 240
Loc: Ohio, USA

Offline
70,71 (oooooo black borders!!!), 73,74,76,77,78 (all white boarders...all have same feel and to me are equally attractive.

1975....now there is a winner.. each card is its own set... WOW.... the color in that set is UNPARRALLED by any set EVER MADE

1972... butt ugly indeed... whoever designed that set should be shot on sight
1979.....why is it every time i see a 79 and that swooping T for Topps i think of KMART...and i get sick to my stomach at the CHEAPNESS...... I SEE BLUE LIGHTS!! I SEE BLUE LIGHTS!!!

52-whatever..too expensive
53-ditto
54-wow..classic..hope to build someday
55-56-ditto
57 to 69..... AWESOME....not a bad design in the house (1966 aint great though)....
80-awesome
81-poodoo... nice cheap hats... UGH!!
82-86... i love it.. 1986 has an AWESOME design.. its the black version of 1964... only there are NO Rookies in the set AT ALL!!! and its overproduced!!!
87- ive seen so many of them i get SICK every time i see them
88-89?? did topps even produce set these years?
90- nice color.. but still poodoo
91- Nice.. nice CHEAP looking 40th aniversary..way to go topps
92- not bad.. better then 91
93-not bad.. losing the 80s cherap look
94-2000.... NO IDEA.... i stopped collecting baseball completely.. too much poodoo
2001- topps heritage... UNBELIEVEABLE- i own a master set!!!
2002- topp heritage...nice... though i only bought the sosa and bonds
2003- topps heritage... i got 8 box case in my closet right now.. and will be opening that up this summer :).....a case for every year after too...it dont get better then todays stars on the best card designs ever of yesteryear

_________________________
--------------------
I love CAKE....

Top
#40797 - 03/30/03 06:46 AM Re: Box was a real loser due to condition... [Re: Lothar52]
Dungeon
If you have a dream about out-posting me, you better wake up and apologize.


Registered: 02/28/03
Posts: 2787
Loc: Still Married!

Offline
I loved the 1987 design. Its a shame they printed so much of it! I think the Ugliest set design EVER would have to be 1991 Fleer and that yellow border atrocity. It looks like someone peed all over the batch of cards after production. 1952 Topps has got to be the best looking. Talk about peaking early. Their finest set was their first set.
_________________________
"Flesh eating is unprovoked murder" - Ben Franklin

Top
Page 2 of 2 <12


Moderator:  EARLSWORLD 
Hop to:
Who's Online
0 registered and 11 anonymous users online.
Newest Members
defghi104200, jklmno253672, hijklm176309, defghi521014, klmnop450123
1967 Registered Users

Generated in 0.015 seconds in which 0.001 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression disabled.